awk. ward.
Jul. 2nd, 2007 06:16 amfrom the comments over at Roy's
He left out The Guy Who Wrote the Hit Piece for the Wingnut Journal, but it's all good.

If you haven't followed the comments thread on that Dreher post, you are missing a treat.
First some commenters point out to Rod that the "diversity is bad" conclusion is inferred by John Leo and Rod Dreher and is not one that Putnam makes in his study. Putnam's study merely shows that when people of different backgrounds are living around each other, in the short term there are some issues to work through.
Rod and his acolytes THEN explain that the real nut in the article is the item that Putnam was trying to bury his own study because it didn't fit in with leftist orthodoxy, thusly proving how liberals HATE science. Next Putnam himself turns up(!), stating that the notion that he is trying to bury the results of the study are absurd and a lie. He says that he has been publishing and discussing this study very openly for something like 6 years and even provides links as proof.
This causes Rod Dreher (to his credit)to apologize to Putnam. Crunchy's commenters, however, proceed to call Putnam a liar who has some sort of personal vendetta against John Leo.
He left out The Guy Who Wrote the Hit Piece for the Wingnut Journal, but it's all good.
