from the Wall Street Journal
alrighty, then.
Since I'm reasonably certain that this sort of thing is helping to perpetuate the unpleasantness and encourage provocative behavior amongst the less reflective of us, and even more certain that's precisely what it's intended to do, let's (god, I know, this is _really_ kinky) apply a little critical thought to this, shall we?
( yeesh. )
Obama Faces Resistance From Top Supporters of Clinton
Sen. Barack Obama, the presumed Democratic presidential nominee, faces dissent from dozens of top fund-raisers and other supporters of former rival Sen. Hillary Clinton, who are angry over how she was treated during their bruising primary battle and are hesitating to back Sen. Obama.
Some leading Clinton supporters are starting new Web sites or political action committees aimed at prodding Sen. Obama on issues or pressuring him to give Sen. Clinton a big role in the general-election campaign. People familiar with the matter say the effort involves dozens of the roughly 300 Clinton "Hillraisers," individuals who raised at least $100,000 apiece for her campaign.
The Clinton holdouts are typically most angry about what they say was the media's sexist treatment of Sen. Clinton during the campaign. And though few, if any, blame Sen. Obama directly, they fault the Illinois senator and other party leaders for what they say was failing to do enough to stop it.
Susie Tompkins Buell, a Hillraiser from San Francisco, said, "What really hurt women the most was to look back and see all this gender bias." Ms. Buell said she hasn't decided whether to vote for Sen. Obama and plans to skip the August Democratic convention.
...
Meanwhile, an analysis of campaign-finance records conducted for The Wall Street Journal by the nonpartisan Center for Responsive Politics shows that in May, when Sen. Obama was widely believed to have clinched the Democratic nomination, only one Hillraiser had switched allegiance to the Obama campaign.
alrighty, then.
Since I'm reasonably certain that this sort of thing is helping to perpetuate the unpleasantness and encourage provocative behavior amongst the less reflective of us, and even more certain that's precisely what it's intended to do, let's (god, I know, this is _really_ kinky) apply a little critical thought to this, shall we?
( yeesh. )