now that's scary
May. 14th, 2004 01:43 pmLooking out from inside the lower reaches of Thomas Friedman's intestines darkly:
Dig it. His approach up to this point has been nonpartisan.
It seems as if the intelligent 11-year-olds (OK, genius 11-year-olds, but still) are on to Mr. Friedman. I shudder to think how far further down he'll have to go to lose his base.
Because I tried to think about something as deadly serious as Iraq, and the post- 9/11 world, in a nonpartisan fashion -- as Joe Biden, John McCain and Dick Lugar did -- I assumed the Bush officials were doing the same.
Dig it. His approach up to this point has been nonpartisan.
It seems as if the intelligent 11-year-olds (OK, genius 11-year-olds, but still) are on to Mr. Friedman. I shudder to think how far further down he'll have to go to lose his base.
no subject
Date: 2004-05-14 11:28 am (UTC)Washingtonpost on the otherhand seems to improve considerably in the last 3 years.
no subject
Date: 2004-05-14 11:55 am (UTC)OTOH, the Post has Carolyn Hax and Judith Martin and the Times has Bob Herbert and Paul Krugman, so nothing is as holistic as all that...
no subject
Date: 2004-05-14 04:13 pm (UTC)WashingtonPost on the other hand has far better Iraq reporting. Plus they nail the Senate floor, their traditional strength. Washingtonpost used to be a totally backwater newspaper compared to NYTimes when it come to foreign news. Reading their foreign report is like a chinese newspaper describing uptown bling-bling. It gets the basic facts right, but compeletly miss the point.
Or maybe that just my increased expectation compared to internet. Consider web site + blogs. Newspaper cannot compete against combination of blogs for on the ground reporting combined with strategy analysis sites like janes, stratfor, debka, globalsecurity, etc. Newspaper increasingly becomes only a smal part of mosaic rather than a main source like it used to be.
no subject
Date: 2004-05-14 04:16 pm (UTC)